Bruce’s Journal

sometimes 140 characters just isn't enough 

Just another "I don't get Twitter!" article... There are so many.


Just read an article in The Daily Journal online (whatever that is).... about Twitter, etc.  (see http://is.gd/rTtG )

Here's my reply....

_____________


Just another "I don't get Twitter!" article...

There are so many.

Understanding the true power of Twitter takes about 18 months of use... for a very intelligent person.

Others may never get it.

Here's a clue:   "It's NOT about 'What are you doing?'. It's about 'What are you THINKING?'"

Here's one more clue:  "90% of the power of Twitter is NOT in using Twitter.... but in using Twitter Search."

That should be enough hints for now.

Keep in touch.  Stalk me if you like.  :)   http://brucewagner.com

PS - My EXACT DATE OF BIRTH is required in order to post this reply on the Daily Journal!?!?!?  Talk about an invasion of privacy!!  What the hell is the Daily Journal anyway!?!????




Bruce Wagner

phone / text  646-363-1942
web  http://brucewagner.com
show  http://bruceanded.com  
photostream  http://is.gd/jPe5
email  bruce@brucewagner.com
email policy  http://three.sentenc.es
twitter  http://twitter.com/brucewagner
twitter feed by email  http://is.gd/k5yX

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [1]

Is BitTorrent Dangerous and Illegal?

Recently, I received this email from a friend....

Hi Sweetie - my friend who has good connections warned me about Torrent thusly - is this wrong?

Now, about that Torrent stuff. VERY dangerous! Not just because it's illegal and sooner or later they are going to start pouncing again like they did with Napster and later file sharing system users. Some folks got slammed with huge fines. The torrent streams are swarming with filthy digital vermin. If you haven't picked up anything yet, count your blessings. And seriously, the networks are having hard times lately and they are going to get serious about revenues and go after some sacrificial victims. You really do not need this sort of trouble, and you really do not need those tv shows.

I trust your expertise so I'm not as concerned as I might be if you were not my source for this..........but obviously I'm here to learn.



Here is my reply....

Yes.  Your friend is wrong.    :)

1.  BitTorrent is not illegal.

2.  In a few countries, sharing copyrighted content is illegal (including the USA).  However...

3.  Many progressive countries, such as in Canada and Spain for example, allow file sharing of copyrighted material.  In those countries it is EXPLICITLY LEGAL to share copyrighted material.

4.  Using BitTorrent for non-copyrighted material is completely legal everywhere -- even in the most backward countries, such as the USA.

5.  No one in the USA has ever been prosecuted for downloading copyrighted material.

6.  People have been prosecuted for UPLOADING copyrighted content in the USA....  However, the chances of them being prosecuted -- statistically -- are far less than the chance that they will be struck dead by lightening.... twice.  Therefore,

7.  Driving 56 MPH in a 55 MPH speed limit zone is far far far more illegal and dangerous than using BitTorrent.

8.  You physically CANNOT get a virus by downloading Movies (AVI files), TV Shows (AVI files), Music (MP3 files), Audiobooks (MP3 files), eBooks (PDF files), etc.  

9.  You can only get a virus if you download and run Software.   and...

10.  Even if you download and run Software ... If thousands of people have downloaded that particular torrent, and all of the feedback (comments) are positive, then the likelihood of getting a virus from that torrent is very very low.  (Plus, of course, if you use Ubuntu, you cannot get a virus at all.)

Hope this helps clarify.

For simple plain-english instructions on how to use BitTorrent to download whatever you want for free...  See  DownloadEverythingFree.com

Only Love,
Bruce

Bruce Wagner

phone / text  646-363-1942
web  http://brucewagner.com
show  http://bruceanded.com  
photostream  http://is.gd/jPe5
email  bruce@brucewagner.com
email policy  http://three.sentenc.es
twitter  http://twitter.com/brucewagner
twitter feed by email  http://is.gd/k5yX

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [1]

The End of the Age of Copyright: Why Supporting Artists Means Supporting Piracy


Recently, the tech blog, TechCrunch, did a story titled, "Did Last.fm Just Hand Over User Listening Data To the RIAA?" (see http://is.gd/ki7M )

The story is mildly interesting...  It appears to be mainly a reporting of some gossip - which may or may not have any truth behind it.   And it leads one to wonder who would be stupid enough to download music illegally, then freely post that fact back to the internet via crazy spyware-like programs like Scrobbler (which is totally voluntary... i.e. self-inflicted spyware, if you will).

But the real juicy stuff...  The meat of this item...  comes in the Comments section...  posted below the item...

It is the most interesting, enlightened, discussion I've ever seen of the issues of:

  • "record labels"  ~versus~  "file sharing"
  • "IP (intellectual property rights)"  ~versus~  "freedom of information in the age of the internet"
  • "old copyright law"  ~versus~  "piracy"

I think it can best all be summarized by two comments....  One, by a person called, "LW".   And, the second, my reply to that one....

Here they are:


______

LW - February 20th, 2009 at 7:04 pm PST

I think we do need a culture shift.

There are whole hierarchies of people who sit between the music makers and the listeners who are most likely not needed in the digital era. From what I've read, bands and artists make the majority of their money from radio royalties and from gigging. In terms of downloads and CD sales, they receive a far slimmer slice of the profits; and in some cases, they receive even _less_ from downloads. The industries standard response doesn't wash, quite frankly.

I'm not trying to legitimise piracy - but maybe I am trying to rationalise it.

In my view, sometimes legislation can't be used to turn a tide. I think that there are a lot of lessons that can be learnt from the open-source movement. While open-source software products (IP) are distributed for free, the creation of these products, creates an ecosystem where services can be sold.

As far as I can see, creating this kind of service-based economy is the logical step in terms of trying to 'monetise' any type of IP.

I think the main problem with this idea, is that large corporations would have a difficult time maintaining control. Which isn't necessarily bad for society in my opinion.

I'll definitely read about Lessig and Creative Commons, thanks for the tip.

______

And, my reply....

______
 
Re: Comment posted by "LW", Feb 20, 7:04pm PST

I've read every single comment here.

YOU dear sir/madam have hit the nail on the head…

You've brilliantly summed up the entire "record labels versus piracy", "IP versus the digital age", etc…. issues… Or as I call it, simply, "The end of the age of copyright."

I suggest everyone here go and read that particular post by LW again. And again. Read it slowly and thoughtfully three times. Now, print it, save it, and learn from it.

He/she has expressed what I've been saying for years...

It is a new ecosystem that is being created - like it or not - by whatever means. Go with it happily. Embrace it. Or be dragged into it kicking and screaming like a child throwing a tantrum.

But enter into a new age, you will.

It's a new ecosystem where value is placed on the ARTIST, by the CONSUMER…. and the do-nothing money grabbers in the middle - who "make nothing but money" - are banished from the playground.

Their days of exploiting artists.... paying them pennies per record sale....  while at the same time extorting $25 for a CD that cost them 8 cents to reproduce... ARE OVER.

And the entire world sighs a sigh of relief...  as they sing, Good riddance.

Where the financially successful artist freely gives away all his/her works in electronically reproduceable and shareable forms (like, Nine in Nails, one of the first major artists to "get it", and make millions$ as a result!), and then… The artist's works are spread all over the planet within seconds…. like a nightmare virus….  (but in a good way! :)

The artist makes his/her BIG money, where they've ALWAYS made their big money… all along.... the one thing that CANNOT be duplicated… Their real LIVE, in-the-flesh, concerts, appearances, speaking engagements, commissioned works, etc., etc… And radio royalties too...

HOWEVER, with their newfound fame and popularity (remember their best works were/are being freely distributed to 183 countries around the globe....????)....  They are now ABLE TO CHARGE TOP DOLLAR for their public appearance, concerts, etc.

No more extortion/exploitation of artists by record labels....   and....  No more extortion of the public by record labels.

THE ARTIST MAKES LOADS MORE money... than he/she would have before....  (assuming their work is popular, naturally).   And the consumer pays a lot less too!   Only paying for the concerts, not the CDs...

But there's MORE...   Brand new unknown artists have an exactly EQUAL and DEMOCRATIC platform to promote thier works on..... as the biggest names in the business!   How wonderful is that!?!?   For them, AND for us all.... to enjoy better quality....  worldwide!

The only people on the planet served by the RIAA...... and the record labels....  is the RIAA... and the record labels.

The ARTISTS and the PUBLIC are served by a free, fair, and thoroughly file-sharing internet....  Thank you, God!

The artists who undertand these concepts...  and adapt fastest....  i.e. GIVE AWAY all their music freely on http://Mininova.com etc...  Will be the most financially sucessful of them all...  (again, assuming that people enjoy their work, of course. ;)

Just like Ubuntu, the new far superior computer operating system is quickly replacing Windows on PCs worldwide… as is FOSS (free open source software)… The company heavily backing it, Canonical, will make a fortune…. How!? By selling its consulting and training services to corporations who need it. After all, "Who knows Ubuntu better than the folks who created it?" …or so the logic goes.

Record labels have extorted money out of the masses while exploiting the artists. That's was ok…. Then.

But now…. They're day has come.

It's a glorious new day for artists and content creators worldwide!   And an even better new day for us… the public who so appreciates, enjoys, and freely loves to support and reward them… at their live concerts.

______


Your thoughts?

Reply in the comments below.

 
 
Bruce Wagner  
http://brucewagner.com  
 
 

Are you into 140-character profundity?

Let's stay connected:  Follow me on Twitter  ...and I'll follow you right back.  click it:  http://twitter.com/brucewagner

Subscribe to email updates of all my new photos as I take them:  Bruce's Photostream  click it:  http://is.gd/jPe5

Don't use twitter yet?  Subscribe to once-a-day maximum:  Email Updates of Bruce's Twitter Feed  click it:  http://is.gd/k5yX

Just want little tidbits, and less often?  Subscribe to email updates of my little blog:  Bruce's Journal  click it:  http://is.gd/k5DQ

Or...  Of course, visit my blog directly any time, here:  click it:  http://brucewagner.posterous.com  
 
And email works too...   Happy to hear from you...   bruce@brucewagner.com
 
Or even by old-fashioned one-on-one voice technology...  the telephone...  call me & let's chat!  646-714-3230

You can even call me toll-free from your computer, by simply clicking the big "call me" button... after you click here:  http://is.gd/kauE

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

A classic... is a classic... forever. :)

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

BRAINSTORM ALERT ~ How to "Favorite" PEOPLE (not just tweets), and even Save Notes About Each One

~~~ BRAINSTORM ALERT ~~~
 
I was just musing, earlier today...
 
I wish Twitter had a way to:
 
(1) Bookmark, or "Favorite", certain PEOPLE.... similar to the way
it allows you to "favorite" certain individual tweets... and....
 
(2) a place to store my OWN notes about that person.... i.e. "met in
Aspen in '08"
 
WELL....
 
I just thought of this!
 
Duh! ( aka, "an AH-HA moment", Oprah.... )
 
Create a folder on your Firefox browser's "Bookmarks Toolbar" called
 "Twitter People".
 
Inside that folder, optionally, create more folders: i.e. "Personal
Friends", "Celebrities", "CEOs", "Twitter Elite", "Companies",
"Twitter Friends", etc.
 
You can even break it down further, like I did: Inside
"Celebrities"...., create folders for: "Movie Stars", "TV Stars",
"Authors", "Comedians", "Internet Stars", etc.
 
Get it?
 
Then.....
 
BOOKMARK each user's Twitter page... into those folders. ( Simply
drag that little tiny icon just before the "http://" down into the
proper folder! )
 
That's it!
 
Even get really crazy and sort them on your list based on how
'important' they are to you...
 
ALSO.... for extra credit...
 
Once the person is bookmarked into the proper folder.....
Right-click on his/her name, and click "Properties". You can then add
your own NOTE about that person, to the end of their name...
 
For example, change, "Twitter / edwardgel".......... to: "Twitter /
edwardgel - that guy I met in that trendy bar in Aspen in Feb 08"
 
FINALLY.....
 
for the win
 
SMART PEOPLE: Use http://FoxMarks.com to backup and share all your
bookmarks, with all your other computers... and even access them via
any internet computer (via the http://FoxMarks.com web site).
 
YEAY! HOW AWESOME IS THAT!?!?
 
Now you can REMEMBER.... "Who in the world was that person again???"
 
And..... "I remember I chatted with the founder of Google.... What
was his name again???"
 
Please share your best tips / thoughts / ideas with me!
 
 
Only Love,
 
Bruce
 
http://twitter.com/brucewagner
 
http://brucewagner.com

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [3]

le Café - Oldelaf (english subtitles)

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

Ed's nephew, Rhody Kyle, and new niece, Kayla Kylie at Halloween, and Kayla's Batpism. Are they the cutest or WHAT!?

In these pics, you'll see Ed, his sister Lorena, his brother Rhody,
and Rhody's wife Gloria... and their two little ones, Ed's nephew,
Rhody Kyle, and new niece, Kayla Kylie... at Halloween, and Kayla's
Batpism. Are they the cutest or WHAT!?

               
Click here to download:
Eds_nephew_Rhody_Kyle_and_new_.zip (16552 KB)

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

How I got sent for a 'time out' for playing too rough with the toys... ;)


This is my response to Mike Fitzsimon's brilliant expose, "An Army of ReTweet-Bots…"  ( see it here http://is.gd/jylH )

____

The funniest part is...  I did it just for fun.

There were only 17 of them.  Using TwitterFeed.  It was the simplest, most obvious, thing in the world.   It's not like it took a brain surgeon.  I wondered why I was the first one to think of it...

Anyway, now the whole world has thought of it...  LOL

It was slightly amusing to to see myself rise to the #2 position on the RetweetRank list...  "OMG! I'm showing up on that list ABOVE @kevinrose and @stephenfry and Everyone!"  That was amazing, and stupidly simple!

Then, I just throttled back the frequency of their RTs... so I would fall down to around position #46 (still in the top 50, tho, ;)

The irony of it is...  While setting up this little game was fun, and slightly amusing...  It didn't benefit me in the slightest.  Not one iota.  I could tell that I got ZERO new followers from it.  Because, No One looks at the RetweetRank list... (except the few people actually ON the RetweekRank list)....   And I already HAD 4,699 followers.  

So, as I said, it didn't benefit me at all.  Not sure why I didn't just turn them off completely....  again, it was mildly amusing to watch.  And maybe inside, I was dying of curiosity to see how long it would be before anyone would notice.

But the stupid mistake I made (well, OTHER stupid mistake) was to leave them on... 17 "virtual people" RT-ing every 12 hours...   They would simply repeat the last thing I said, no matter What it was!   LOL   Too funny!!!  It cracked me up every time!  :)

So, Mike had the lucky fortune (or misfortune, depending on how you look at it ;) of being the last @reply I sent.... just before the 12-hour mark... and the "robots" kicked in....  I sent an @reply to HIM.

So, of course, he received 17 Retweets (RTs) of an @reply.... from me to him.   I'm sure he thought, "Now THAT's odd."  Obviously.

He simply, out of curiosity, checked out the profiles of those 17 people...  And it was VERY obvious what they were all about...  

Each profile would post a headline from some news source, like CNN or whatever, every 30 minutes.  And then, post a RT of the latest thing I had said, once every 12 hours.

Every single post clearly stated, just next to the date and time, "posted from twitterfeed" ...as you can see clearly in the screenshots on Mike's blog.  Even to the casual observer, it was plain as day.

As an aside, another thing which was Really funny to me was...  

Some of these "bots" accumulated up to 200 followers themselves!  More followers than many of the people I chat with on Twitter have!  LOL   Who follows a bot!?!?  LOL

So, in conclusion...

It was fun.  It was silly.  It was funny.  It was also a stupid thing to do.  And I now know, it was a violation of the twitter TOS.  (..as I have since been informed. :)

It didn't benefit me in the slightest in any way (except for my own amusement).

It also didn't harm anyone in the slightest either ...as Mike's son, Andy, pointed out.

I don't sell anything.  

...not even my own consulting services or anything.  ...so in spite of what one may assume, it was NOT "spam-related".  I don't sell anything at all.

The only thing I offer is slightly amusing profundity, via 140-character tweets.   :)    ...and great twitter friendships.   (I Love <3 my twitter peeps!)

But it's all good.

The world is safe now... that those evil twitter "robots" have been destroyed!   ;)

Another Irony:   Just the day before, I finally made the list of the "Twitter Elite", at http://twitter.grader.com/topusers - coming in at position #60, of the Top 100 - which is based on Quality of Content... NOT on number of followers, nor number of retweets soley.   That is a GREAT honor!   ...to know that my tweets have really been appreciated, and continue to be... (regardless of the number of followers or retweets).  That makes me Very happy.   :)

We are reminded once again... Twitter, just like the internet at large, is not a perfect system.

Ya know how ya never REALLY know who you're chatting with on the internet...?  People are not always who they claim to be.  (Betcha figured that one out, by now! But we often forget.)  Things on the internet, and things on Twitter, are not always as they appear.
 
Love you all!
 
Bruce
http://brucewagner.com
 
http://twitter.com/brucewagner

 

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [6]

There has been some discussion about whether my poll on human sexuality is biased in some way. (RT Pls)

There has been some discussion about whether my poll on human
sexuality is biased in some way. (see the poll here:
http://ping.fm/PnUF3 )
 
Following is my reply to that discussion...
 
_____
 
 
Using an obviously derogatory term, like "homosexual", in a poll
question.. is the BEST example of poll bias I've ever seen.
 
This is exactly one of the reasons I created this poll...
 
Did you point out that my poll has been RT-ed (retweeted, i.e.
re-broadcast) to ALL of Twitter at large...? And that the other poll
was only posted on one guy's blog...?
 
His audience is obviously an extremely selective subset of the public
- whereas Twitter at large represents a much larger, broader, public
sampling.
 
As I have stated many times, I invite you to broadcast the poll
anywhere (public & unbiased) you want to... The more responses we
get, the more the numbers seem to stay the same.
 
Use any Title you want to...
 
I suggest simply:
 
  "Please take this anonymous poll: http://ping.fm/PnUF3 RT Pls"
 
If your beef is with the title... CHANGE the title...
 
If your beef is with the sample group... rebroadcast it to a larger
(unbiased!) public...
 
I only ask that you:
 
(1) always include the word "anonymous", to address the fear of
closeted gay/bi people.
 
(2) please try to refrain from using terms generally considered
derogatory, or clinical, like "homosexual", or "faggot", or "queer",
or the shorter version, "homo".
 
(3) distribute in the most public way possible - not to a specialized
mailing list of only southern baptists or anything.
 
If your beef is simply with the results... Deal with it.
 
Please take my anonymous poll, everyone! http://ping.fm/PnUF3 RT Pls"

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [1]

Sorry, Bill, I'd rather kiss my new boss!

The more you look at it, the funnier it gets...

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [16]